November 3, 2009

New name… new blog

What’s in a name? I’ve kind of grown used to the name Sandra Fraser, I’ve had it for more than 20 years, so when my long-term partner proposed marriage and asked me to take his surname instead of my ex-husband’s I admit, I wrestled a little with the idea. It’s a name I share with my children, for one thing, and a name by which I’ve become known professionally. But as he pointed out, it’s not my maiden name and he’d like us to share a surname as well as our life together. So here I am, four days after my wedding, trying to get used to it and hoping I’m not confusing my small following.

In this day of internet, mail redirection and websites, I’m hoping that whoever goes searching for me will find me as easily under the letter K as they did under F.

If you click here you’ll get taken to my new blog and a whole new world besides. Nothing else has changed, I still smell as sweet… Sandra Kessell

October 20, 2009

The Five Arrows Hotel – food review

 

Never one to turn down the chance of a food review, I said yes in double quick time when asked to dine at The Five Arrows Hotel in Waddesdon – a mere stone’s throw away from home – certainly within cycling distance… though we took the car.

http://tiny.cc/lhW8v

September 29, 2009

More than camp comedy – Julian Clary uncovered

Julian Clary - Lord of the Mince

Julian Clary - Lord of the Mince

 

Lord of the Mince may be the name of his latest show, but there’s far more to Julian Clary than camp comedy. Interview by Sandra Fraser.

 

 

Outrageous, risqué, shocking – just a few of the words that spring to mind when describing Julian Clary. He shot to fame as the Joan Collins Fan Club (alongside Fanny the Wonderdog), with a brand of humour that was full of innuendo and, at times, jaw-droppingly vulgar. He hasn’t put the double-entendre behind him, so to speak, but recently we’ve been seeing another, softer, less acerbic side of Julian, with appearances on Strictly Come Dancing and Who Do You Think You Are? plus a number of roles hosting and presenting top-rated television chat shows and quizzes.

But just as his public, and perhaps, his parents, may have thought middle age was mellowing him, Julian has set a series of tour dates which will feature his full-on brand of blue humour in all its glittering peacock glory.

So which is the real Julian Clary, the dog loving, chicken-keeping, country-living home-bod who wears shorts, a tee-shirt and no make-up, or the glammed-up, MAC-sponsored diva with a sharp retort on the end of his tongue and an album of air-brushed images on his website?

Julian says they’re both him, one persona “just happens” when he’s on stage, but it could be “a bit unbearable” if he were to stay in stage character all the time.

“On stage is on stage but I can stop being glamorous at home – it’s easy,” he says, adding that unlike Michael Barrymore, who allegedly found real life dull compared with the excitement of performing and presenting, he has never found it difficult to switch between the two.

Julian sighs when I bring up his notorious 1993 quip about the then Chancellor Norman Lamont, on live television at the British Comedy Awards. But though it took place more than 15 years ago, it was a defining moment, not only for broadcasting, but for Julian Clary too – and everyone who knew I was about to interview him couldn’t help but mention it.

“I think I thought it was a funny line. I didn’t think I would still be talking about it this much later,” he says. The “funny line” left him professionally sidelined for more than a year, though the complaints, it has to be said, only trickled in. A mere 12 were received from an audience of 3 million, but producers and TV executives became a little twitchy about what Julian might do next. In retrospect Julian says he understands what made him overstep his own mark.

“Fifteen years later I can see that my life needed to come down a bit. I needed some time off,” he says, musing whether he pushed a self-destruct button to buy himself personal space.

“I quite enjoyed being outrageous back in the Eighties but I didn’t feel like any great crusader,” he says, adding later that in the context of today’s most outrageous programming, his shows and comments were never really that shocking.

Iconic figures like Danny La Rue, Kenneth Williams and Larry Grayson were at the forefront of camp humour throughout the Seventies and beyond, but though they pushed at the boundaries of their era, Julian’s show was unique when he first hit the big time. He brought a blend of shock, horror, humour and high-camp to an open-mouthed and disbelieving audience, the majority of whom became instant fans. Certainly they took Fanny to their hearts. Julian’s star rose and rose, though it hadn’t been his dream to become a stand-up comedian.

“I thought I was going to be a pop star, then an actor. Slowly it dawned on me that writing and performing my own material was much more exciting to do,” says Julian, who studied English drama at Goldsmiths College. He liked being self-sufficient, relying on his own talent rather than waiting at the beck-and-call of a show director or film producer with on-going auditions and castings. Self-deprecatingly, he says he didn’t have the versatility to make a career of acting, though television and stage roles have since come his way.

He is a man to set himself challenges, however, which is why he seized the opportunity to take part in Strictly Come Dancing. He reached the show final with partner Erin Boag, much to his surprise, and restrained pride.

“It’s hard not to learn a few basics when you’re being taught by a world-class dancer,” says Julian, with modest understatement. “She helped me overcome my fear of dancing and I realised any kind of fear can be overcome.”

Armed with his new-found additional confidence, he accepted the role of the Emcee in Cabaret, in the West End’s Lyric Theatre, cutting a chilling character. He has also written two novels, brought out an autobiography and penned a regular column for the New Statesman. So are there any more challenges left?

“A few, yes. You don’t write one novel or two novels, and think, ‘I’ve done that now.’ I want to do more writing. I want to do a musical and act in some Shakespeare. There are lots of things bubbling under the surface,” he says, going on to name some of his recent credits, like Just a Minute and Have I Got News for You.

“I think if I was just stuck doing one thing I would be bored,” says Julian, adding that he likes to diversify, which begs the question, why return to camp and close-to-the-knuckle stand-up? The answer is simple, he loves to make people laugh, he finds it very satisfying. He hopes he finds himself doing another tour to celebrate turning 60 and another when he’s 70.

Seriously? Can he really see himself still on stage in his seventies?

“I can’t see into the future,” he says, a touch defiantly, “so I don’t know.”

He switches into stage persona and delivers the line that there’s a care home down the road that he’s got his eye on when the time is right. He fancies sitting in the window watching the world go by. Not for him the sad decline into lonely old age, like some “miserable old queen,” as he puts it. One wonders what the rest of the residents would make of him, let alone the nursing staff.

Julian has had his sticky moments but says life is pretty settled right now.

“It would be unbelievable if I’d got to my age without any ups and downs,” he says, in trademark whiny voice.

Julian lives with his boyfriend near Ashford in Kent, in a house once owned by Noel Coward, with his dog Valerie, puppy Albie and a growing flock of hens. Former transvestite comedian Paul O’Grady, who has recently thrown off his trademark Lily Savage wig and declared he will no longer be dressing up, is a neighbour and friend.

“I’ve no desire to live anywhere else at the moment, other than with my boyfriend, it’s inspiring,” says Julian. “I’m very contented.”

Finding contentment led to him agreeing to take part in the genealogy programme, Who Do You Think You Are? He feels so much of one’s make-up is genetic and the programme helped on his journey to self-knowledge. He discovered German ancestry on both sides of family tree as well as a genteel artist.

Julian’s show, Lord of the Mince, is the product of looking deep into himself, he says. He promises his audiences not only a bit of biography, but a recently discovered and unexpected new talent of his own. 

“Everything is more acceptable now. But I don’t think it’s anything to do with me,” says Julian. A new generation of comics may well beg to differ and a phalanx of fans are truly grateful.

Julian Clary’s show Lord of the Mince will be at Oxford New Theatre on October 9 and Cheltenham Town Hall on October 29. Julian’s parents live in Swindon and he expects they will be in the audience when his show hits the town’s Wyvern Theatre on October 16 & 17.

For a full list of tour dates and booking information visit www.julianclary.co.uk

This article appears in the October edition of Cotswold Life magazine

September 18, 2009

Press okay if you want to join in…

I’ve had a trying day – without wishing to name-drop it’s involved the lovely David Jason and the besieged Heston Blumenthal, not in the same place, but almost at the same time.

At the very end of July I was commissioned to write for a new food book – not a great time to start phoning up harvesting farmers and holidaying restaurateurs, who traditionally take a break in the summer. Still, it was, is and will be, a lovely addition to bookshelves and kitchens the nation over, and it’s being brought out by  an award-winning publisher, so I pressed on, despite only having five weeks in the summer holidays to complete it. Most people I approached to be in it were thrilled to be asked. Though they’re regularly acknowledged for being among our nation’s best producers (some had received stamps of approval from Rose Prince and Rick Stein, I found out afterwards) they recognise good publicity has a knock-on effect and no-one can afford to be complacent in these cost-cutting, cash-stricken times.

But in the same week that an international picture agency were trying to sting a colleague for mistakenly using an un-invoiced-for image (it’s a long story, I’m not going there – but their approach is pretty short-sighted if they want future business from him and his account is worth thousands to them each year) I’ve found myself chasing, chasing and chasing again a particular PR company for client photographs. Perhaps their client, the aforementioned Mr Blumenthal, didn’t need the good publicity, I thought, as I fired off yet another e-mail and made yet another phone call. A final post-deadline stand-off ensued, more of which below, resulting in me taking my bat home – I’d write about someone else, I said, as I metaphorically stalked off the pitch.

In fact, I wasn’t on a pitch at all and that, at least, contributed to my huffiness. I was being corralled into a side room at a very posh venue while waiting to interview the adorable Mr, actually Sir, David Jason. My fellow journos and I (including the Beeb, ITV’s Meridian News and local radio) having been promised lunch and a bit of an interview, if we waited through the charity speeches and congratulations, were offered not terribly appetising sandwiches (which were eaten by our minders) and told to stay in our room while the real guests, the ones that we weren’t allowed to mingle with in case we ate all their canapés, got on with the job of networking. I started to feel like a teenager; I wanted to stamp my feet, slam doors and stomp out of the room. I rang my office, found a terse e-mail had been sent telling me not to include Mr Blumenthal, and contented myself with phoning his people (and my publisher) and telling them I’d be writing about the Roux brothers and their sons instead.

Well, despite everything I’m glad I waited for Sir David. He’s as delightful in real life as he is on screen. Okay – the charity was a good cause and all that, so no-one was going to write a bad news story on the back of it, but treating the press like pariahs when you also want a bit of good publicity doesn’t buy you a few extra column inches, or airtime, or goodwill. A couple of the news journos were getting dangerously close to deadline and wondering how they were going to edit their takes, drive to a studio and get on air with what little time they had left. I wondered if I’d want to return to next year’s event, for a freelance job on a flat fee it took five hours, not including travel time and involved an awful lot of frustration.

When I’d finished with Sir David (and I can’t emphasise what a pro he is – charming, accommodating and polite, despite obviously being tired at the end of his busy day) there was a phone message on my mobile. It was Heston’s PR company explaining that the earlier e-mail had been a mistake and their client would like to be in the book after all.

It seems that all’s well that ends well. But a little bit of preaching to PR and marketing companies. Be nice if you’ve got the press asking you for a good news story, even if you don’t want to participate this time you may want them some other time, and you never know who is going to be in charge of the magazine or newspaper you approach in the future and how good their memory is. There are easy ways of saying politely, thanks, but no thanks, we’re too busy, or it’s not a good time for us. Positive press is generally acknowledged to be worth 10 times its size in advertising. Bad publicity? You do the maths.

A good publicist ought to know the difference without a single word from me but you’d be surprised at how many haven’t got the message yet…

September 2, 2009

Lady Henrietta Spencer-Churchill

Here’s a link to an interview I did a couple of years ago with photographer Mark Fairhurst.

http://tinyurl.com/henriettaspencer-churchill

August 20, 2009

Someone in Swansea has a job thanks to me…

I shouldn’t be doing this – I’ve got a commission to contribute 10 features to a food book and an interview with a Vice-Admiral (whom I addressed as a Vice-Admirable yesterday, but that’s another blog) to prepare for. But I’ve finally got a little time at my desk and I can’t help but share that I’ve been reeling this week from a brush with bureaucracy – actually, I feel bowled out by the leg-spinners of bureaucracy, to use a cricket metaphor and show solidarity with our boys at the Oval.

Eight (that’s right EIGHT) brown envelopes arrived on Monday amongst which were notices for car tax (okay, knew about that), income tax (have recently returned to self-employment), changing child benefit (Child One leaving school, Child Two staying on for A levels, Child Three still going through the processes and the step-children not on my books) and, most horrifically of all, a demand that I renew my driving licence. This last absolutely floored me. What, I hear you cry – have I been on the wrong side of the law and been banned for a while? Have I lost my old licence? Have I mislaid something vital? 

No, it turns out that since I have a relatively up-to-date photo-style driving licence, complete with a picture of me, of course, I now have to have it regularly renewed. No matter that I look exactly the same as I looked when I had that photo done (ie. fierce and, I hope, unrecognisable to all who love me); no matter that there must be hundreds of thousands of drivers with paper (ie photo-less) licences; no matter, in fact, that it’s actually only three years since I last updated my driving licence (but not my photo) because I moved house. Why, I can’t help wondering, was I not asked to update my photo then? If there was an option to do so I must have missed it. So it is I find myself having to fork out another £20 to keep a faceless bureaucrat in a job in Wales. It also dawns on me that since I’m obviously “in the system” I will now have to change my driving licence regularly. At least updating your passport is optional on the grounds that if you don’t leave the country, you don’t need to worry that you look 20 years older than the last startled photo-booth image you submitted to the passport office (who, incidentally, have amazingly efficient, helpful and kind staff and no, I’m not being ironic, they really are stars).

I really hope that plans for ID cards continue to be put on hold. Besides my national insurance number card (which doesn’t have a photo, thankfully) and my recently renewed passport, my driving licence is surely ID enough. If ever I get pulled over by the police for anything I do wrong, I hope they recognise me from my soon-to-be submitted photo. I doubt that they will – in fact, I hope that they don’t. No-one ever looks that bad in reality – do they? Not even if they’ve been caught at it.

August 16, 2009

How fast, how high, how strong?

Jessica Ennis’s awesome World Athletics Championships gold medal today has to be hailed as a triumph. Determination, concentration and dedication in a 5ft 4in package (that’s around 163cm) makes her the ultimate pocket rocket. She’s a multi-talented heptathlete and in terms of modern-day sportsmen and women, a titch. We’ve become so used to seeing Amazonian women bestriding various sporting arenas, (one former women’s Wimbledon champion this year commented that at 5ft 9in she feels tiny when she stands beside today’s players in the locker room). We’ve forgotten size isn’t everything. 

At the same time, however, the web is littered with articles stating that athletes feel under pressure to stay slim, sometimes irrevocably damaging their future health, and sporting careers, in their quest for model-status and glory. Not hard to understand when you read the comments levelled at the tennis-playing Williams sisters, Serena heavier and shorter, and Venus, taller and rangier, but winners, both, though their WTA personal statistics would suggest an unashamed penchant for fiction in certain quarters. How refreshing to read in Easy Living last month that world-beating British cyclist Victoria Pendleton wishes her thighs were bigger. She doesn’t care if she has to go up a jean size to accommodate her quest for sporting gold.

But I digress. I unreservedly applaud Ennis and I sat staring cheesily at the television screen as she took her rivals on in every discipline and led the heptathlon competition from start to finish this weekend. But while I know about plyometric training, fast-twitch muscles and explosive power, and that muscle size doesn’t equate to strength, (look at Jonathan Edwards’s skinny pins when he was at the height of his career). While I know all about the power of self-belief, which clearly Ennis has in spades, I just have to point out that if I were a six-foot tall (183cm) female British high-jumper, with the usual build for this discipline, I’d be hopping up and down in shame that someone so small could jump so much higher than me, both in real and in relative terms. Ennis holds the UK high jump record at 1.95m – that’s a standard ruler length above her head height. If any of our six-foot-tall female high jumpers packed that much oomph into their jumps they’d be the world, let alone the British, record holder – since 1987 it has stood at 2.09 metres (6 ft 10.28 in). Either high jump isn’t as glamorous as heptathlon or else our rising talent is still in development. The UK Athletics site has a blank where the female high jumpers should be.

The 2012 Olympics beckons both male and female sports heroes and I’m hoping there will be plenty of people in a British vest to cheer about. I’m already planning which athletics events I’d like to go and see in the new London Olympic stadium. Jessica Ennis will be on the top of my list – can the rest of the team match her prowess?

© Sandra Fraser

www.sandrafraser.com

 

www.jessicaennis.net

BBC News website

August 6, 2009

Newly posted under character interviews: Olympic medallists Sir Matthew Pinsent and yachtswoman Sarah Ayton, celebrity chef Antony Worrall Thompson

June 26, 2009

The wrong racquet

There are a lot of questions being asked this Wimbledon fortnight. So far, we’ve seen the worst set of performances from British players in living history as one by one, barring Baltacha and Murray, they crashed out in the first round. True, our views could all change if Murray satisfies over-hyped hopes and delivers a place in the men’s singles final next week – or better still, wins the title outright. But even so, for a sport with millions of pounds available to produce a British champion, how come there are so few home-grown players to cheer about?

Well, here’s a thing that seems to have bypassed the Great British public – possibly because the media pays so little attention to anything not jumping up and down under its nose. Whilst waiting 70+ years for a male British tennis star to head the international rankings, we have, by and large, ignored our superstars in the sports of squash and badminton. Give or take a bit of jaw-dropping when badminton’s Nathan Robertson and Gail Emms wowed Olympic watchers five years ago, nobody has taken a blind bit of notice as British squash and badminton players have flown the flag. Did you know British squash players have held the World No 1 spot in both men’s and women’s singles rankings in the last 10 years or so? Or that we currently have three men and three women in the world top 10? Scroll down through the world’s top 50 in either gender and the ranking list is littered with English and Scottish and occasionally Welsh players.

British badminton players have a tougher time of it – the sport is massive in China, Indonesia, Malaysia and, funnily enough, Denmark, millions of people play it fanatically worldwide, but even so, we have three men and three women in the world top 40 singles players’ rankings, a men’s pair at world No 10, a women’s pair at No 20 and a mixed pair at No 7, it would be higher but Gail Emms retired last year.

You can bet your last penny of lottery funding that either of these sports’ governing bodies would be thrilled with an annual £20m coming into the coffers courtesy of the world’s biggest tournament – the reality until recently has been they’ve managed to deliver champions on a fraction of that. Badminton has just secured £20m-worth of funding – but that is for use over a four-year period. What’s more to the point is both sports are managing to attract British youngsters and keep them interested in playing until they reach the top of the tree. Is there a lot of prize money at stake here? Lots of sponsorship deals to be made?  - er, no. But something keeps these players returning to the courts, to their training regimes and their coaching routines. Anyone who thinks tennis is more gruelling than either squash or badminton hasn’t seen them played properly. A shuttlecock can reach speeds of up to 200mph – that’s mid-rally – a squash ball? Up to 170mph. Don’t tell me there are not enough tennis courts for keen kids to play and practise on – in the vicinity of my son’s school there are six – you have to travel five miles to get to the nearest squash or badminton court – where, by the way, you’ll find even more tennis courts to play on. Whether keen kids can get on to them is another matter, but they are there. For my part I think money is the problem, not the answer. There’s too much self-interest in tennis and not enough gutsy go-getting.

While I was watching my youngest son’s tennis coaching session from the car recently, (he’ll never make anything more than a social player, but he’s keen and I’m happy to fork out £50 a term to give him a lifelong hobby) Radio 5 announced that Andy Murray’s physio and fitness coaches are paid for by the LTA. The local coach reacted with disgust, as well she might, when I told her.

“What I’d give to have some of that money here,” she said, surveying the handful of enthusiastic, but not very good, 11-year-olds who’ve been attending her weekly fun sessions for more than a year. Whilst I watched she invited the two football-loving boys who had spent the previous week pressing their noses up to the wire fence to come and hit a few balls in exchange for a bit of ball-boying. They were far better than the kids they joined – naturally talented with good hand-eye co-ordination. And that’s where at least some of the answers lie. I pay for my son to have lessons not because I think he’s going to be lifting the Davis Cup in 15 years’ time, but because he likes it and I’m a middle-class mummy. I’d be only too happy to see the talented footballing two-some offered free coaching because the tennis association has realised it needs to get the right kids involved at grass roots level if it wants to turn out champions. In two weeks’ time, the footballing talent will have gone back to what it knows best. Wimbledon’s media spotlight will have been switched off for another year and tennis, by those two boys, at least, will have been forgotten. But it needn’t be so.

Tennis could look to the nation’s successful sports, badminton and squash among them, to see why kids who have natural sporting talent are not choosing to step on to a tennis court. If the answer is they can’t get the opportunities then the whole sport of tennis, not just the LTA, has to blame itself for failing to produce world-beaters.

Either that, or sports writers need to look for sports that are delivering British champions to find their headlines. I think I know where they could start…

© Sandra Fraser

Badminton world rankings

Squash world rankings

Lawn Tennis Association

June 3, 2009

MPs’ expenses

Here’s an arena that needs stepping into either lightly with fairy feet so no-one takes offence, or with hobnail boots on and a baseball bat for protection.

I’ve met a few politicians – some very high ranking – in my working life, most recently, around six weeks ago, it was David Cameron at the other end of a handshake. I can’t say I’ve warmed to every single one I’ve met, some are more engaging than others, some treat all journalists as if they were best kept at the end of a very long bargepole – unless there’s an election coming up, in which case they want their good deeds reported on – and large, please. Some quite clearly are career politicians with a watchful eye on self-promotion, others obviously take their role as public servants very seriously indeed. There are many shades of grey in between.

The so-called MPs’ expenses row is rumbling on and on and showing no sign of dying down – today Jacqui Smith announced she would step down at the next cabinet re-shuffle, and Alistair Darling is increasingly under pressure to resign before being replaced. Embarrassing? Yes. Newsworthy? Er – yes, obviously. Though The Telegraph is making the news, it isn’t making up the expenses claims.

Some of the expenses claimed seem just plain bonkers, no need for me to highlight them, they’ve been splashed across every newspaper and media site in the country. Others are completely understandable – anyone whose constituency is more than 60 minutes away from Westminster needs somewhere to rest their head for the night – a second home of some description or Commons halls of residence perhaps? Take your pick over which you believe in, but the days of the Gentlemen’s Club are long gone for most people and many a politician would prefer his or her family to be in London during the working week.

Some claimants will not extract a shred of sympathy from me, others I’m saddened to see caught in a mesh of Parliament’s own weaving.  Dr Ian Gibson, MP for Norwich, has been made an example of over his second home expenses. Yet he’s an MP with a strong social conscience, who does sterling work, not only for his constituents, but in the field of cancer healthcare, for example. Having a London flat that you spend four nights a week in can’t be seen as unjustifiable, though selling it on to your daughter at an allegedly knock-down price and staying in it, and, more to the point, continuing to claim for it, as though it were still your own, does make for a tarnished halo. Seeing a decent man being hauled before a star chamber and effectively de-selected by his party is like watching a small nut being bashed by a fairground-sized sledgehammer. It does leave you wondering what other agenda is being served, especially when there are bigger, sleeker, slimier fish to fry, if you’ll pardon the mixed metaphors. The constituency party ought to have been given the discretion to assess Dr Gibson’s track record for themselves, and to weigh up his good deeds against his alleged misdemeanours before deciding on balance if  he could pass muster in front of the electorate.

It used to be an office joke that the most creative writing in a newsroom took place on the days when expenses forms were filled in. But certainly in my working lifetime, all claims have had to be accompanied by receipts – and, label me paranoid, I always felt I had an imaginary company accountant sitting at my shoulder, questioning every entry – even though I’ve never made a spurious claim in my life and quite often ended up out of pocket after a job, either because I completely forgot to claim for a journey made on company business, or because I’d lost the relevant receipt for a client lunch or item of office equipment by the time I got around to filling the form in. There are honest and dishonest people in every profession, of course, yet I can’t help but wonder how many of those currently baying for politicians’ blood, whether writer or editor, man in the street or opposition MP, have ever refused a tradesman’s request for cash-in-hand for a job. Even if it feels uncomfortable counting the notes into an outstretched palm because it seems unlikely it will ever be mentioned on a tax return, how many of us would take the view that it’s the tradesman’s job to disclose the information and not the client’s job to cast aspersions about his honesty and risk having a monkey-wrench taken to the bracket.

So, that brings about two questions. Why didn’t the Parliamentary Fees Office give MPs who claimed freely and creatively the feeling they would be called to account? Surely no monkey-wrenches were being brandished?

And secondly, why didn’t those MPs who made daft, dodgy or devious claims ever wonder – how would I feel if this claim were published in my local newspaper for my constituents to read just before the next election? Many MPs clearly did feel that way and kept their claims to a bare minimum. Given that it’s our money they are asking for as well as our votes, the honest and scrupulously fair among them have a better chance of election this time next year. I just wish those who are a whiter shade of grey were also being allowed to stand as well.